Saturday 30 January 2016

* Chidambaram and Madurai Households*




It   is   said   that   the   first   bondage   of    society   is   marriage.  This   has  been  said and  stood  the  test  of  time.  A  happy   fusion  of  body   ( temporarily )  and    mind ( permanently )  goes  to  make a marriage successful. Mutual understanding,     display of  love  and  affection,  expression of  care and  concern,    between  man  and  wife  are  the  hallmarks  of   a   happy   matrimonial  relationship.  This  is  nothing  new,  but   has  been  in  vogue  from  time  immemorial,   spanning   from   the   days  of   the  great  epics.  Our  Puranas  are  replete  with  innumerable  stories   emphasizing   the   importance   of   conjugal   bliss,  so   as   to  lead   a   meaningful  and   constructive   life.

The  fact  that  Lord  Rama  is  still  considered,  revered  indeed,   as   the  most   perfect  Mr. Clean,  by  millions  of  Hindus  lends  credence  to  all  the  characteristics  that  an  ideal  man  should   possess,  stand   for  and   uphold   in   his  life. That  the  Almighty   Himself    took  birth  as  the  Prince  of  Ayodhya  for  inculcating   the   values  and   virtues   which  humans,  more  particularly   the  masculine  class,  should  possess  and  pursue, is  really  awe inspiring.   As  a  Divine  Avatar, it  was  possible   for  Lord  Rama  to  lead  a  clean  and  virtuous  life.  Ordinary   mortals   should   try   their   best   to  practice   as  many   tenets  as   possible  that   the  Lord   possessed,  as  it  would   be  next   to   impossible  to   espouse  Him  in  entirety,   given  the   modern   world    in  which  we  live  and   the  travesties  that  it  unfolds.  Equally Sita Devi is eulogized  for  her  noble  character,  patient attitude, unswerving love and affection showered on her husband and family et al, which are looked high upon by the society  in  general  and  womenfolk  in  particular, to this day.  Ram and  Sita  were  and  are  still the most revered  divine,  epic couple.

It   is  enshrined   in  Bharatiya   way    of    life,   that    the   Pathni  /   Sahadharmini   ( wife )  should  obey  her  Pathi ( husband ),  in  word,   spirit   and  conduct,  take  care  of   him   and   their  children,   thereby  upholding   the   greatness   of         womanhood ( Naarimani ).  This   has   been   the   dictum   and   has  also  been  followed  from  epic times.  It   holds  good   even  now,  in   a   vast   majority   of   Indian  households,  but   for   a   selective   few    ones,   where   the   situation   is    topsy-turvy   and   works   the   other   way   round. 

It   is  generally  said  that  in   all   those   households   where   the   masculine   voice  holds  sway,  there  would   be  peace and  tranquility. If   the  situation  is  not  so,  then the principle of   manhood,  and  all   other   features  attached   to  it  gets lost,   as  brevity   becomes  a  casualty  and  meets  its  waterloo.  A  disquieting  development  is  that  this  trend  is   prevalent   in   some   families  today,  with   the  hapless   husbands’  suffering  from  the  indignities  harped  on   them   by   their  dominant   life   partners’.

On  reading  the  above  paragraph  readers  should  not  come  to  a  hasty  conclusion that  these  are   the  utterances   of   a   male   chauvinist,  who  stands  for  subjugating women.  Definitely   not  so.   I   am   a   strong  exponent  for  the   provision  of  equality  to  women  in  all  spheres   of  life   in  the  modern  world, subject to the parameters concerning behavior and  conduct  that  nature  has stipulated  on  them   under  Bharatiya  Samskaram.   Leaving   behind   and   throwing  away  superstitious  beliefs  and   practices  that  have   permeated   into   the   Indian  system   and   way   of   living,  there  are   certain  mandatory,  golden  rules   which  have  to   be   preserved   and    put   into  practice. They   cannot  be  erased  or  rejected,   as   they   do   have   an   everlasting   validity   and   warranty.

In  the  Tamil  Country,  it  is  commonly  said   that  in   all    those  families  where  men  have  a determining say  in  family  matters,  it  is  normally  referred  to  as          a  “ Chidambaram “ household,  more  so  named  and  called  after  the  presiding  deity of  the holy shrine at Chidambaram – Lord  Nataraja,  who  symbolizes  manhood  and holds  sway  over  his  consort  Goddess  Sivakami.  I  perceive  that  this  is   the  picture  in  a  majority  of  houses,  even  today. 

Contrarily  in  those  families where  the  above  scenario gets  reversed,  whereby  the feminine force subjugates and dominates their men counterpart, it  is  called  a               “ Madurai “ household,  more  so  because  of  the domineering  force and  power exercised  by  the  presiding  deity  of  Madurai  city –  Goddess  Meenakshi.

How  and  when  did  this classification of  Tamil Households into  the Chidambaram and  Madurai  pattern  got  evolved,  I  am  not, rather  nobody  is  sure  about.  But  this  has  been  in  vogue  for  millenniums.  Who  coined  this  term  is  also not known clearly.  This  has been doing the rounds for centuries in the Tamil country, and  whether  this  would  have  seen  birth  without  substance  and evidence is  another  thing  to  be  pondered. Personally  I  do  not  perceive  this  to   be   a  slip  of  the tongue  utterance  or  a jovial  pun  thrown  at   people  and  their  household  behavioral  pattern. It  should definitely  have  some  reasoning  behind  it.  As  the  saying  “ There  is   no  smoke  without   fire  “ holds   meaning,  both  in  substance  and  logic,  the  Chidambaram  and  Madurai  pattern  of  household   control,   also  holds  some   weight.

On  a  personal  perspective,  the  above  classification  ( narrating  the   supremacy   of  men   and  women   respectively  at  home )  does   not  seem    to   be   an   exaggerated  or  hypothetical   statement,  as   I  have  personally   seen   this  element  of  subjugation  on  some  friends  and  associates, who  are  dominated  by  their  husbands’ and   wives’.  It  is  a   pity   to  see  them   digest  and   tolerate  ignominies   thrown  on  them  by   their  life   partners’.  I  have  stopped   visiting   them,  just  to  save  embarrassment.     

 I   close   thus -    Men   to   be   called   so   must   be  adaptable and  brave.   If tormenting   their   wives’  is  loathsome and shameful,  then fearing  them  is   unmanly and inglorious.    Women   to   be  called   so  must   be  accomodative  and  suave,  they  should  neither  fear  for  nor  dominate  their  husbands “ .  Only   an  optimistic  combination  and  a  balanced   mix  of  control,  affection  and   understanding,  symbolizing  the  characteristics  of   both    patterns,   between       the  “ Bharya “  and  “ Bhartha “   would   go  to  make  an     ideal    family.                                                                                                                                                                                                 ========
(* written after observing the plight of some henpecked heroes and tormented dames )